Atherosclerosis
Volume 204, Issue 2 , Pages 483-490, June 2009

Differential metabolic effects of pravastatin and simvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients

  • Kwang Kon Koh

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Vascular Medicine and Atherosclerosis Unit, Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, 1198 Kuwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon 405-760, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82 32 460 3683; fax: +82 32 460 3117/467-9302.
  • ,
  • Michael J. Quon

      Affiliations

    • Diabetes Unit, NCCAM, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • ,
  • Seung Hwan Han

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Yonghee Lee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Soo Jin Kim

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Jeong Beom Park

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Eak Kyun Shin

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea

Received 19 June 2008; received in revised form 5 September 2008; accepted 13 September 2008. published online 03 November 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Lipophilic and hydrophilic statins have different effects on adiponectin and insulin resistance in experimental studies and different effects on the rate of onset of new diabetes in large scale clinical studies. Therefore, we hypothesized that simvastatin and pravastatin may have differential metabolic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients.

Methods

This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study. Age, gender, and body mass index were matched. Forty-three patients were given placebo, simvastatin 20mg, or pravastatin 40mg, respectively once daily for 2 months.

Results

Simvastatin and pravastatin therapy significantly changed lipoprotein levels and improved flow-mediated dilation after 2 months when compared with baseline (P<0.001) or placebo treatment (P<0.001 by ANOVA). Simvastatin therapy significantly increased insulin levels (mean % changes; 127%, P=0.014) and decreased plasma adiponectin levels (10%, P=0.012) and insulin sensitivity as assessed by QUICKI (6%, P=0.007) when compared with baseline. By contrast, pravastatin therapy did not significantly change insulin levels (−3%, P=0.437) but significantly increased plasma adiponectin levels (9%, P=0.011) and insulin sensitivity (6%, P=0.008) when compared with baseline. In addition, these effects of simvastatin were significant when compared with pravastatin (P<0.001 for insulin levels by ANOVA on Ranks, P<0.001 for adiponectin and P=0.001 for QUICKI by ANOVA). When compared with baseline, simvastatin significantly increased plasma leptin levels (35%, P=0.028), but pravastatin did not (1%, P=0.822).

Conclusions

Despite causing comparable changes in lipoprotein and endothelium-dependent dilation, simvastatin and pravastatin therapy had differential metabolic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients that may be clinically relevant.

Keywords: Statins, Adipocytokines, Insulin resistance, Endothelial function

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9150(08)00677-1

doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.09.021

Atherosclerosis
Volume 204, Issue 2 , Pages 483-490, June 2009