Atherosclerosis
Volume 205, Issue 2 , Pages 342-348 , August 2009

Comparability of methods for LDL subfraction determination: A systematic review

  • Mei Chung

      Affiliations

    • Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, United States
  • ,
  • Alice H. Lichtenstein

      Affiliations

    • Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, United States
    • Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, 711 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, United States
  • ,
  • Stanley Ip

      Affiliations

    • Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, United States
  • ,
  • Joseph Lau

      Affiliations

    • Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, United States
  • ,
  • Ethan M. Balk

      Affiliations

    • Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Box 63, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111, United States.

Received 18 September 2008 ,Revised 5 November 2008 ,Accepted 8 December 2008.

References 

  1. Balk E, Ip S, Chung M, Lau J, Lichtenstein A. Low Density Lipoprotein Subfractions: Systematic Review of Measurement Methods and Association with Cardiovascular Outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment (Prepared by Tufts Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, under contract No. 290-02-0022). Rockville, MD. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; June 16, 2008. (http://www1.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewtechassess.asp?from2=viewtechassess.asp&where=index&tid=56&).
  2. Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486–97.
  3. Krauss RM. Dense low density lipoproteins and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:53B–57B
  4. Krauss RM. Dietary and genetic effects on low-density lipoprotein heterogeneity. Annu Rev Nutr. 2001;21:283–295
  5. Chapman MJ, Guerin M, Bruckert E. Atherogenic, dense low-density lipoproteins. Pathophysiology and new therapeutic approaches. Eur Heart J. 1998;19(Suppl 30):
  6. Berneis KK, Krauss RM. Metabolic origins and clinical significance of LDL heterogeneity. J Lipid Res. 2002;43:1363–1379
  7. Scheffer PG, Bakker SJ, Heine RJ, Teerlink T. Measurement of low-density lipoprotein particle size by high-performance gel-filtration chromatography. Clin Chem. 1997;43:1904–1912
  8. Scheffer PG, Bakker SJ, Heine RJ, Teerlink T. Measurement of LDL particle size in whole plasma and serum by high performance gel-filtration chromatography using a fluorescent lipid probe. Clin Chem. 1998;44:2148–2151
  9. Hirany SV, Othman Y, Kutscher P, Rainwater DL, Jialal I, Devaraj S. Comparison of low-density lipoprotein size by polyacrylamide tube gel electrophoresis and polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119:439–445
  10. Jeyarajah EJ, Cromwell WC, Otvos JD. Lipoprotein particle analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Clin Lab Med. 2006;26:847–870
  11. Blake GJ, Otvos JD, Rifai N, Ridker PM. Low-density lipoprotein particle concentration and size as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as predictors of cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation. 2002;106:1930–1937
  12. Witte DR, Taskinen MR, Perttunen-Nio H, van TA, Livingstone S, Colhoun HM. Study of agreement between LDL size as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance and gradient gel electrophoresis. J Lipid Res. 2004;45:1069–1076
  13. Ensign W, Hill N, Heward CB. Disparate LDL phenotypic classification among 4 different methods assessing LDL particle characteristics. Clin Chem. 2006;52:1722–1727
  14. Hoefner DM, Hodel SD, O’Brien JF, et al. Development of a rapid, quantitative method for LDL subfractionation with use of the Quantimetrix Lipoprint LDL System. Clin Chem. 2001;47:266–274
  15. Davy BM, Davy KP. Comparison of assessment techniques: plasma lipid and lipoproteins related to the metabolic syndrome. Lipids Health Dis. 2006;5:3
  16. Dormans TP, Swinkels DW, de GJ, Hendriks JC, Stalenhoef AF, Demacker PN. Single-spin density-gradient ultracentrifugation vs gradient gel electrophoresis: two methods for detecting low-density-lipoprotein heterogeneity compared. Clin Chem. 1991;37:853–858
  17. O’Neal D, Harrip P, Dragicevic G, Rae D, Best JD. A comparison of LDL size determination using gradient gel electrophoresis and light-scattering methods. J Lipid Res. 1998;39:2086–2090
  18. Davies IG, Graham JM, Griffin BA. Rapid separation of LDL subclasses by iodixanol gradient ultracentrifugation. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1865–1872
  19. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making. 1991;11:88–94
  20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310
  21. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46
  22. Miller GW, Myers GL, Rei R. Why commutability matters. Clin Chem. 2006;52:553–554

 The authors of this report are responsible for its content. Statements in the report should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

PII: S0021-9150(08)00897-6

doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.12.011

Atherosclerosis
Volume 205, Issue 2 , Pages 342-348 , August 2009