Atherosclerosis
Volume 209, Issue 1 , Pages 10-17, March 2010

Autologous stem cell therapy for peripheral arterial disease:

Meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature

  • Gian Paolo Fadini

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Divisione di Malattie del Metabolismo, Policlinico Universitario, via Giustiniani, 2, 35100, Padova, Italy. Tel.: +39 049 8212185; fax: +39 049 8212184.
  • ,
  • Carlo Agostini
  • ,
  • Angelo Avogaro

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padova, Medical School, Padova, Italy

Received 17 June 2009; received in revised form 5 August 2009; accepted 17 August 2009. published online 10 September 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common cause of disability and mortality. Up to one third of patients are not susceptible to traditional revascularization and may benefit from stem cell therapies.

Objective

In this meta-analysis, we sought to determine whether autologous cell therapy is effective in the treatment of PAD.

Methods

We searched the English literature in Medline, Excerpta Medica and the Cochrane database for trials of autologous cell therapy in patients with PAD published before 31 January 2009. We included controlled and non-controlled, randomized and non-randomized trials using autologous bone marrow or granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood cells to treat PAD. We also collected data from trials of G-CSF monotherapy, as a control treatment.

Results

In a meta-analysis of 37 trials, autologous cell therapy was effective in improving surrogate indexes of ischemia, subjective symptoms and hard endpoints (ulcer healing and amputation). On the contrary, G-CSF monotherapy was not associated with significant improvement in the same endpoints. Patients with thromboangiitis obliterans showed some larger benefits than patients with atherosclerotic PAD. The intramuscular route of administration and the use of bone marrow cells seemed somehow more effective than intrarterial administration and the use of mobilized peripheral blood cells. The procedures were well tolerated and generally safe.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicates that intramuscular autologous bone marrow cell therapy is a feasible, relatively safe and potentially effective therapeutic strategy for PAD patients, who are not candidate for traditional revascularization. Larger, placebo-controlled, randomized multicenter trials need to be planned and conducted to confirm these findings.

Keywords: Endothelium, Angiogenesis, Cardiovascular diseases, Bone marrow, Meta-analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9150(09)00697-2

doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.08.033

Atherosclerosis
Volume 209, Issue 1 , Pages 10-17, March 2010