Atherosclerosis
Volume 221, Issue 1 , Pages 169-175, March 2012

Non-lipid effects of rosuvastatin–fenofibrate combination therapy in high-risk Asian patients with mixed hyperlipidemia

  • Sang-Hak Lee

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Kyoung-Im Cho

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Maryknoll Medical Center, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Jang-Young Kim

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Young Keun Ahn

      Affiliations

    • Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Seung-Woon Rha

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Yong-Jin Kim

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Yun-Seok Choi

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Si Wan Choi

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Dong Woon Jeon

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Center of National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Pil-Ki Min

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Dong-Ju Choi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Sang Hong Baek

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Kwon Sam Kim

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Young Sup Byun

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Yangsoo Jang

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82 2 2228 8461; fax: +82 2 2227 7732.

Received 24 October 2011; received in revised form 3 December 2011; accepted 22 December 2011. published online 24 January 2012.

Highlights

► Rosuvastatin–fenofibrate combination and rosuvastatin monotherapy were compared. ► We randomized 180 Asians with mixed hyperlipidemia with 24-week drug treatment. ► Incidences of muscle or liver enzyme elevation were similar between the two groups. ► The combination changed homocysteine, renal and hematologic parameters more.

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study is to compare the non-lipid effects of rosuvastatin–fenofibrate combination therapy with rosuvastatin monotherapy in high-risk Asian patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

Methods

A total of 236 patients were initially screened. After six weeks of diet and life style changes, 180 of these patients were randomly assigned to receive one of two regimens: rosuvastatin 10mg plus fenofibrate 160mg or rosuvastatin 10mg. The primary outcome variables were the incidences of muscle or liver enzyme elevation. The patients were followed for 24 weeks during drug treatment and for an additional four weeks after drug discontinuation.

Results

The rates of the primary outcome variables were similar between the two groups (2.8% and 3.9% in the combination and the rosuvastatin groups, respectively, p=1.00). The combination group had more, but not significantly, common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (13.3% and 5.6%, respectively) and drug discontinuation due to AEs (10.0% and 3.3%, respectively) than the rosouvastatin group. Combination therapy was associated with higher elevations in homocysteine, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine, whereas elevation in alanine aminotransferase was greater in the rosuvastatin group. Leukocyte count and hemoglobin level decreased to a greater extent in the combination group. The combination group showed greater reductions in TG and elevation in HDL-cholesterol.

Conclusion

In our study population, the rosuvastatin–fenofibrate combination resulted in comparable incidences of myo- or hepatotoxicity as rosuvastatin monotherapy. However, this combination may need to be used with caution in individuals with underlying pathologies such as renal dysfunction (NCT01414803).

Keywords: Asia, Creatine kinase, Fenofibrate, Rosuvastatin, Safety

 

PII: S0021-9150(12)00002-0

doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.12.042

Atherosclerosis
Volume 221, Issue 1 , Pages 169-175, March 2012