Multi-detector row Computed Tomography (MDCT) permits non-invasive visualization of the coronary arteries. The ability to visualize and, with limitations, to characterize non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque has been described. We investigated the CT attenuation of non-calcified plaques as determined by 16-slice MDCT in comparison to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
Methods and results
Thirty-two patients were investigated by contrast-enhanced 16-slice CT. In addition, IVUS of one coronary artery (motorized pullback) was performed (LM+LAD: 22, LM+LCX: 4, RCA: 6). At 252 sites within the coronary system, in which non-calcified atherosclerotic plaque could be identified both in MDCT and IVUS, the CT attenuation within the plaque was measured using a centrally placed region of interest and correlated to the appearance of the plaque in IVUS at the corresponding location. The mean CT attenuation within plaque that corresponded to hyper-echogenic appearance in IVUS was 121 ± 34 HU (n = 76). The mean CT attenuation within plaque that corresponded to hypo-echogenic appearance was 58 ± 43 HU (n = 176, p < 0.001). However, there was substantial overlap of the density values measured by MDCT in the two groups.
A significant difference of the mean CT attenuation within atherosclerotic lesions of hypo-echogenic and hyper-echogenic appearance in IVUS could be observed. However, we observed substantial overlap of attenuation values between plaque types so that the differentiation of “vulnerable” and “stable” plaques based on their CT attenuation is doubtful.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Atherosclerosis
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography.Circulation. 2002; 106: 2051-2054
- Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction.Circulation. 2003; 107: 664-666
- Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses.Eur Heart J. 2003; 25: 1043-1048
- Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary disease, patient versus segment-based analysis.Circulation. 2004; 110: 2638-2643
- Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution.Heart. 2005; 91: 938-941
- Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 128-132
- Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography.JAMA. 2005; 293: 2471-2478
- Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 mm × 0.75 mm collimation and 375 ms rotation.Eur Heart J. 2005; (EPub May 27, 2005)
- Non-invasive assessment of plaque morphology and remodeling in mildly stenostic coronary artery segments: comparison of 16-slice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound.Coron Artery Dis. 2003; 14: 459-462
- Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound.Circulation. 2004; 109: 14-17
- Characterization of vulnerable nonstenotic plaque with 16-slice computed tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound.Am J Cardiol. 2004; 94: 99-100
- Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 1430-1435
- Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 1241-1247
- Ex vivo coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with multi-detector-row CT.Eur Radiol. 2003; 13: 2094-2098
- Reliability of differentiating human coronary plaque morphology using contrast-enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography: a comparison with histology.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004; 28: 449-454
- Multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic lesions in human ex vivo coronary arteries.Atherosclerosis. 2004; 174: 243-252
- Noninvasive characterization of plaque morphology using helical computed tomography.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1998; 39: 527-534
- Accuracy of density measurements within plaques located in artificial coronary arteries by X-ray multislice CT: results of a phantom study.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001; 25: 900-906
- Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography.Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 1426-1431
- Intravascular ultrasound: novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications.Circulation. 2001; 103: 604-616
- Atherosclerosis studies by intracoronary ultrasound.Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997; 430: 197-212
- Variability in tissue characterization of atherosclerotic plaque by intravascular ultrasound: a comparison of four intravascular ultrasound systems.Am J Card Imaging. 1996; 10: 128-209
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 1886-1898
- Measurement of vascular diameter in vitro by automated software for CT angiography: effects of inner diameter, density of contrast medium, and convolution kernel.Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182: 1313-1317
- Advances in cardiac CT imaging: 64-slice scanner.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004; 20: 535-540
Published online: February 22, 2006
Accepted: January 11, 2006
Received in revised form: January 3, 2006
Received: October 31, 2005
© 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.