Advertisement

Predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: A comparison of available risk assessment scores

      Highlights

      • CALIBER, GRACE 2.0, PARIS-MB and PRECISE-DAPT scores showed good performance in predicting all-cause mortality.
      • Combined ischemic endpoint was best predicted by GRACE 2.0 score.
      • None of the investigated scores could efficiently predict MI or bleeding complications in short- and long-term follow-up.

      Abstract

      Background and aims

      Thromboischemic and bleeding events are rare but life-threatening complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Various risk assessment models have been established to predict short- and long-term adverse events in patients with chronic and acute coronary syndromes (CCS, ACS). The aim of the present study was to compare available risk assessment systems based on their performance in identifying high-risk patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD).

      Methods

      We enrolled 1565 consecutive patients with symptomatic CAD (n = 821 CCS, n = 744 ACS). CALIBER, DAPT, GRACE 2.0, PARIS-CTE, PARIS-MB, PRECISE-DAPT and PREDICT-STABLE scores were calculated in appropriate patient subgroups. All patients were followed-up for 1, 3 and 5 years for all-cause death (ACD), myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke (IS) and bleeding. The primary combined ischemic endpoint (CE) consisted of ACD, MI and/or IS. Secondary endpoints were defined as single occurrence of either ACD, MI, IS, or bleeding.

      Results

      GRACE 2.0 score showed good discrimination performance (AUC>0.7) for CE in a 3- and 5-year follow-up. CALIBER, GRACE 2.0 and PARIS-CTE showed best performance (AUC>0.7) in predicting ACD throughout the follow-up, whereas IS was best predicted by PARIS-CTE and CALIBER scores. None of the scores performed well (AUC>0.7) in predicting MI or bleeding.

      Conclusions

      In a consecutive German CAD cohort, CALIBER, GRACE 2.0 and PARIS-CTE scores performed best in predicting CE, ACD and/or IS whereas none of the selected scores could predict MI and bleeding efficiently.

      Graphical abstract

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Atherosclerosis
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Piepoli M.F.
        • Hoes A.W.
        • Agewall S.
        • Albus C.
        • Brotons C.
        • Catapano A.L.
        • et al.
        2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.
        Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37: 2315-2381
        • Valgimigli M.
        • Bueno H.
        • Byrne R.A.
        • Collet J.P.
        • Costa F.
        • Jeppsson A.
        • et al.
        2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS.
        Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2018; 53: 34-78
        • van Werkum J.W.
        • Heestermans A.A.
        • Zomer A.C.
        • Kelder J.C.
        • Suttorp M.J.
        • Rensing B.J.
        • et al.
        Predictors of coronary stent thrombosis. The Dutch stent thrombosis registry.
        J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009; 53 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 1399-1409https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.055
        • Généreux P.
        • Giustino G.
        • Witzenbichler B.
        • Weisz G.
        • Stuckey T.D.
        • Rinaldi M.J.
        • et al.
        Incidence, predictors, and impact of post-discharge bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention.
        J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015; 66 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 1036-1045https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1323
        • World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki
        Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects.
        Cardiovasc. Res. 1997 Jul; 35: 2-3
      1. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of.
        Med. Etika A Bioet. 2002; 9: 12-19
      2. ICH harmonized tripartite guideline: guideline for good clinical practice.
        J. Postgrad. Med. 2001; 47: 45-50
        • Williams B.
        • Mancia G.
        • Spiering W.
        • Agabiti Rosei E.
        • Azizi M.
        • Burnier M.
        • et al.
        2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European society of hypertension (ESH).
        Eur. Heart J. 2018 Aug 25; 39 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 3021-3104https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
        • Mach F.
        • Baigent C.
        • Catapano A.L.
        • Koskinas K.C.
        • Casula M.
        • Badimon L.
        • et al.
        2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk.
        Eur. Heart J. 2020 Jan; 41: 111-188
        • Cosentino F.
        • Grant P.J.
        • Aboyans V.
        • Bailey C.J.
        • Ceriello A.
        • Delgado V.
        • et al.
        2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force for diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Associ.
        Eur. Heart J. 2019 Aug 31; 41 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 255-323https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486
        • Lloyd-Jones D.M.
        • Nam B.-H.
        • D'Agostino Ralph B.S.
        • Levy D.
        • Murabito J.M.
        • Wang T.J.
        • et al.
        Parental cardiovascular disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in middle-aged AdultsA prospective study of parents and offspring.
        J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2004 May 12; 291 ([Internet]) (2204–11. Available from:)https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.18.2204
        • Rapsomaniki E.
        • Shah A.
        • Perel P.
        • Denaxas S.
        • George J.
        • Nicholas O.
        • et al.
        Prognostic models for stable coronary artery disease based on electronic health record cohort of 102 023 patients.
        Eur. Heart J. 2014; 35: 844-852
        • Yeh R.W.
        • Secemsky E.A.
        • Kereiakes D.J.
        • Normand S.L.T.
        • Gershlick A.H.
        • Cohen D.J.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of a prediction rule for benefit and harm of Dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention.
        JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2016; 315: 1735-1749
        • Fox K.A.A.
        • Eagle K.A.
        • Gore J.M.
        • Steg P.G.
        • Anderson F.A.
        The global registry of acute coronary events, 1999 to 2009-GRACE.
        Heart. 2010; 96: 1095-1101
        • Fox K.A.A.
        • Gore J.M.
        • Eagle K.A.
        • Steg P.G.
        • Agnelli G.
        • Avezum A.
        • et al.
        Rationale and design of the grace (global registry of acute coronary events) project: a multinational registry of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes.
        Am. Heart J. 2001; 141: 190-199
        • Mehran R.
        • Rao S.V.
        • Bhatt D.L.
        • Gibson C.M.
        • Caixeta A.
        • Eikelboom J.
        • et al.
        Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials.
        Circulation. 2011; 123: 2736-2747
        • Baber U.
        • Mehran R.
        • Giustino G.
        • Cohen D.J.
        • Henry T.D.
        • Sartori S.
        • et al.
        Coronary thrombosis and major bleeding after PCI with drug-eluting stents risk scores from paris.
        J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016; 67: 2224-2234
        • Rao S.V.
        • O'Grady K.
        • Pieper K.S.
        • Granger C.B.
        • Newby L.K.
        • Van De Werf F.
        • et al.
        Impact of bleeding severity on clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes.
        Am. J. Cardiol. 2005; 96: 1200-1206
        • Costa F.
        • van Klaveren D.
        • James S.
        • Heg D.
        • Räber L.
        • Feres F.
        • et al.
        Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials.
        Lancet. 2017; 389 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 1025-1034https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30397-5
        • Droppa M.
        • Tschernow D.
        • Müller K.A.L.
        • Tavlaki E.
        • Karathanos A.
        • Stimpfle F.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of clinical risk factors to predict high on-treatment platelet reactivity and outcome in patients with stable coronary artery disease (PREDICT-STABLE).
        PloS One. 2015; 10: 1-13
        • Thygesen K.
        • Alpert J.S.
        • Jaffe A.S.
        • Chaitman B.R.
        • Bax J.J.
        • Morrow D.A.
        • et al.
        Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018).
        Russ J Cardiol. 2019; 24: 107-138
        • Sacco R.L.
        • Kasner S.E.
        • Broderick J.P.
        • Caplan L.R.
        • Connors J.J.
        • Culebras A.
        • et al.
        An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association.
        Stroke. 2013; 44: 2064-2089
        • Knuuti J.
        • Wijns W.
        • Achenbach S.
        • Agewall S.
        • Barbato E.
        • Bax J.J.
        • et al.
        2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.
        Eur. Heart J. 2020; 41: 407-477
        • Roffi M.
        • Patrono C.
        • Collet J.P.
        • Mueller C.
        • Valgimigli M.
        • Andreotti F.
        • et al.
        2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent st-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of.
        Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37: 267-315
        • CN R.
        Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.
        Circulation. 2007 Feb 20; 115 ([Internet]) (Available from:): 928-935https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402
        • Wallentin L.
        • Zethelius B.
        • Berglund L.
        • Eggers K.M.
        • Lind L.
        • Lindahl B.
        • et al.
        GDF-15 for prognostication of cardiovascular and cancer morbidity and mortality in men.
        PloS One. 2013 Dec 2; 8 ([Internet]) (Available from:)e78797https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078797
        • Huang W.
        • FitzGerald G.
        • Goldberg R.J.
        • Gore J.
        • McManus R.H.
        • Awad H.
        • et al.
        Performance of the GRACE risk score 2.0 simplified algorithm for predicting 1-year death after hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome in a contemporary multiracial cohort.
        Am. J. Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15; 118 ([Internet]. 2016/07/29) (1105–10. Available from:)
        • Bianco M.
        • D’ascenzo F.
        • Raposeiras Roubin S.
        • Kinnaird T.
        • Peyracchia M.
        • Ariza-Solé A.
        • et al.
        Comparative external validation of the PRECISE-DAPT and PARIS risk scores in 4424 acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor.
        Int. J. Cardiol. 2020; 301 ([Internet]) (200–6. Available from:)
        • Kawashima H.
        • Gao C.
        • Takahashi K.
        • Tomaniak M.
        • Ono M.
        • Hara H.
        • et al.
        Comparative assessment of predictive performance of PRECISE-DAPT, CRUSADE, and ACUITY scores in risk stratifying 30-day bleeding events.
        Thromb. Haemostasis. 2020; 120 (22.06.2020) (07): 1087-1095